Thursday, March 20…Rumble (Link Wray)

 

   Yesterday, I decided to seek input from the WonderKids on the winner of the Red-Neck Challenge.  It’s not that I don’t think Kim’s picture edged mine out, because it did. Nope, I just want to see which picture the majority of the grandkiddos will pick as the winner, plus it’s another way to stay in touch with the them.  When we made the video about the Picacho Hwy 5K, I gave three possible endings, sent it only to the Charlevoix kiddos and asked them to choose who they thought won.  A twist on the ‘Choose Your Own Adventure’ books. They picked Grampa as the winner because he was dramatic and flopped over on the picnic table, instead of just touching it.  Truth was we finished it together, only we weren’t looking fresh as a daisy, holding hands and grinning like it showed in the video.

    This time I’m involving all the grandkiddos, even 1-year-old Whitaker.  I made up a postcard with both of our photos, explained the challenge, and asked them to choose the picture they like best.  Then they’re supposed to text me their choice…the pictures are identified only with #1 and #2.   This time it’s a twist on ‘A blind taste test’.   Surveys go out in the mail today…hope to hear from them soon. J

----------

   We pay an annual plan fee to Tactacam, maker of our cell cams, simply so we can transmit pictures/videos to our cell phones. We also pay a monthly fee to request and receive as many of those pictures and videos as we want. Something set the ‘Ditch camera’ off last night after dark so Kim immediately requested a video to see what may have tripped it. The video didn’t show up.  He requested it again this morning and a window popped up saying that “Sorry, we could not request the video you requested. Video was refused since you requested the video before.”  Yeah, but we didn’t receive it, so what do we do next?  The refusal to send the video a second time made me wonder exactly what we’re paying a monthly fee for, so I went to the Help menu. From there I clicked on FAQs and when that didn’t answer the question of what happened to the initial video request, I started a ‘live chat’ option, pretending to be Kim.

   Artificial Intelligence to the rescue because Tactacam Ben was at my service. I lost that chat and had to start over.  My second chat was with Tactacam Ethan A.  Really? Do these chatbots get to pick their own names?  Tactacam Ethan A was very helpful…told us to check the SD card because the cameras have very strict requirements for SD storage to be able to send pics and videos, which we knew from a previous issue. Ethan A sent all the card requirements in detail and also sent an Amazon link for the correct SD cards, just in case we needed one. Like I said, he was helpful.

  We aren’t sure what SD card is in that camera, so maybe that’s the issue. The pictures and videos are stored on the SD card, so we’ll eventually be able to see what tripped the camera. Life goes on.

**Kim got an email from Tactacam later asking him to take a survey regarding his conversations with Bennett and Ethan A.  Really? Bennett? He said his name was Ben, not Bennett.  I did gave Ethan A a good review.**  😎

----------

   Using Tammy’s lithium charger on the bike battery worked like a charm…the battery is charged and the bike started. However, since all indications are that it has a stator issue, riding isn’t advisable. The main thing at this point is to get it in the camper when it’s time to leave and right now it has the juice to do that.  So, I’ll be doing solo rides, unless Tammy rides with me.  We can get it fixed when we get home.

------

   We had vague plans on going for a walk, but we just dawdled the morning away. No other excuse.  By the time we stopped dawdling, it was too hot outside. No sense in tempting heat stroke at this point, so we went to the movies instead. Watched The Last Supper, which felt appropriate given that we’re in the season of Lent.  

----------

   A couple of flowers have blossomed on a nearby prickly pear cactus.  I don’t recall being here long enough to see flowers bloom in years past. In fact, the most I remember seeing are the buds.  Lots and lots of buds, but no flowers. But this year has been warmer earlier, so maybe that’s a factor.  This morning, I wandered over to take pictures of the cactus flower.  A bee was buzzing around, which I thought made for a nice addition to the photos.  Gave the flower an extra dimension. What I didn’t realize until I looked at the pictures on the computer is that the bee was covered in pollen. That was so cool!

----------

   While we were sitting in the camper, trying to get the day started, Kim had me listen to an instrumental song that got banned from the radio back in the 50’s.  It’s an instrumental song, no words…banned because people thought it sounded dangerous. I told Kim his mom would have been on that bandwagon, for sure. Anyway, it made me want to know more, so I googled Link Wray, the man behind the song.  This is a little about him:  

   Wray learned to play guitar at an early age, taking his first lessons from a traveling circus guitarist at age eight. In the late 1940s he began performing Western swing music with his brothers. He contracted tuberculosis while serving as a U.S. Army medic in the Korean War (1950–53) and had one of his lung removed because of the disease. His condition made singing difficult, so he focused on performing instrumental music.

    In the mid- to late 1950s, Wray honed his raw electric guitar sound by playing power chords through an amplifier he had modified by puncturing holes in its speakers, creating a distorted and menacing tone.

 And this is a little about the instrumental song that got banned:

The instrumental song "Rumble" by Link Wray was banned from radio in 1958 due to fears that its title and aggressive sound would incite violence and glorify juvenile delinquency, making it the only instrumental song ever banned from US radio. Here's a more detailed explanation:

The Context: In 1958, "Rumble" was released, a time when there were concerns about rising juvenile delinquency and a perceived link between rock and roll and negative behaviors. 

The Title: The term "rumble" was a slang term for a gang fight, and the song's title, even without any lyrics, was seen as potentially provocative and dangerous. 

The Sound: The song's heavy distortion and aggressive guitar sound, which was a new sound at the time, further fueled the idea that it was "dirty" and "dangerous". 

The Ban: Many radio stations, particularly in New York and Boston, banned the song, fearing it would incite violence among young listeners. 

The Legacy: Despite the ban, "Rumble" became a cultural icon and is now considered a landmark rock and roll track. 

   Kind of reminds me of the rationale behind the recent book banning that’s happening throughout the country.  

----------

   We walked to the big tire in the evening, saw a spectacular sunset and found an animal jaw out in the field by the tire. The jaw was shaped like a long narrow V, had all the teeth and the front teeth angled outward. A search on Kim’s phone indicated a deer or possibly a wild boar. Did another search on the computer when we got back to camp…it’s definitely a deer jaw.  Javelinas and wild boar have large canine teeth…no evidence of there being canines on this jaw. 

----------

   Clear night sky means imaging is a go.  Kim’s targeting Dolphin Head again from about 8 to 10 p.m.  He decided to import the data because he wants to see what he’s got so far.  It’ll help determine if he needs to get more data tomorrow night.   

No comments:

Post a Comment